[Discuss] Changing the definition of cheating

[Thomas Dalton]

> I like the simplicity.  But I don't like that you'll need a 50 item list
> of exceptions to handle the capitol move thing, realm mergers, IC
> banning someone because they are inactive (game mechanics allow it and
> unless you code up an AI agent in php that can parse the "reason for
> ban" box it would be hard to stop), etc.

The inalienable rights cover inactivity, and Tom said they're not
going anywhere. Strategic capitol moves will cease to be an issue once
recruitment is handled at the duchy level (see other thread). As for
realm mergers, I think they should be allowed, but it should be the
decision of the dukes ("Declare duchy part of neighbouring realm..."),
not the ruler (unless they are a duke). That's already vaguely
possible for non-capital duchies, but I suggest it be possible (and
easier to do) for all duchies.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss