[Discuss] Moving the Capital

[Timothy Collett]

On Oct 4, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Tom Vogt wrote:
> You're not wrong there. Except that I don't want to start down the  
> slippery slope of manual intervention.
>
> I see this as something to solve on the player level: You now know  
> that these PLAYERS have no honour in them. If they had, they'd have  
> moved the capital back after receiving the bolts. They didn't. So  
> they're disgusting scum. If I were on the receiving end of this,  
> I'd start an OOC discussion on the ruler channel in order to get  
> other realms on my side for the express purpose of making it clear  
> that we all don't want to play with dishonourable scum.

Thank you for making that clear.

In the past, it has always been assumed that if you, Tom, didn't  
change something back, it meant that you were saying it was OK to  
keep it that way, even if you handed down a punishment related to  
it.  For instance, the infamous Tarasac giveaway debacle...is that  
already over a year ago?  Wow...

So anyway, we thought it was up to you to do this stuff, and we were  
supposed to just abide by whatever punishment you handed down, and  
assume it was sufficient.  Now that we know that's not meant to be  
the case, we can try some player-based justice.

I will take these words to heart, and take them into the game.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family

--

Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.
-- Euripides 



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss