[Discuss] Moving the Capital

[Jason Sweeney]

On 10/4/06, Robert Croson, Jr <robert at arcm.com> wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2006 at 14:10, Jason Sweeney wrote:
>
> > On 10/4/06, Matt Runyon <m.runyon at comcast.net> wrote:
> > > Question: Would it be considered abuse to force a surrendering realm to
> > > move it's capital away from the "front" without any real reason besides
> > > making it farther away for troop recruitment purposes?  (No, this is not
> > > based on the ASI/Abington negotiations, which are different, although
> > > that is certainly what inspired the question)?
> > >
> > > It would certainly seem to be, given the previous discussions, but I
> > > just wanted to clarify.
> >
> > If it were a term of peace, it would be backed up by IC negotiations,
> > and probably supported by the Titans.
>
> You would have to have a good reason that doesn't have anything to do with
> reruiting. Recruiting restrictions are OOC mechanics, and as such cannot be
> used as any form of justification for IC actions.
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribing and other list options:
> http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

No, as a mechanic of the game, a country could easily request that the
enemy move its main force concentration further afield. This is not so
much a game-breaker but an actual concession that many countries have
made to make the peace easier to enforce/accept


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss