[Discuss] Moving the Capital

[Robert Croson, Jr]

On 4 Oct 2006 at 14:10, Jason Sweeney wrote:

> On 10/4/06, Matt Runyon <m.runyon at comcast.net> wrote:
> > Question: Would it be considered abuse to force a surrendering realm to
> > move it's capital away from the "front" without any real reason besides
> > making it farther away for troop recruitment purposes?  (No, this is not
> > based on the ASI/Abington negotiations, which are different, although
> > that is certainly what inspired the question)?
> >
> > It would certainly seem to be, given the previous discussions, but I
> > just wanted to clarify.
> 
> If it were a term of peace, it would be backed up by IC negotiations,
> and probably supported by the Titans.

You would have to have a good reason that doesn't have anything to do with 
reruiting. Recruiting restrictions are OOC mechanics, and as such cannot be 
used as any form of justification for IC actions.



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss