[Discuss] Feedback on Army System

[Jamie Cheyfetz]

On 11/29/06, Tom <tom at lemuria.org> wrote:
> On 11/29/2006 07:17 AM, Jamie Cheyfetz wrote:
> > For instance, in Perdan we have:
>
> People who can't read. The sponsor page says when you create a new army:
>
> The name of the army should be either something like "army of ..." or
> "... army". It will be used in-game
> in various texts such as "knights of the (name)" or "the (name) has
> received new funds".

I guess I didn't make that part clear.  Those "armies" have been
around for years.  Well before the new Army thing came in, obviously.
Each army has its purpose.  Each army has people in it that are
extremely loyal to it.  Each army has people in it that are
competitive against the others.  It seems such a waste to ditch the
armies because of an arbitrary wording constraint that is being
imposed, but I guess that's what's going to happen.


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss