[Discuss] Features I'd like to see,
related to sending gold to family.
Robert Croson, Jr
robert at arcm.com
Fri May 19 16:42:05 CEST 2006
On 19 May 2006 at 17:21, Jaune Cosula wrote:
> It would make deposit gold to family a bit risky, lets say if you plan to fund your brothers realm
> on other continent since he needs quickly some gold and you send home 1000 gold, you take risk
> that part of it or mayby all of it will be gone.
>
> So this system would give "advantage" to those who slowly save up some gold to their family
> instead of those who use home as "bank" to transfer money to their brothers.
>
> I dont know good or bad, but i think that is what were point of this suggestion.
Is the family gold issue all that big of a problem? Does anyone have any hard
data that shows that this is a big problem? Or are we punishing the masses for
the (possible) abuse of the few?
Tom has already stated his position on this:
"You speak as if the family wealth were a bank where you could draw on at
will.
You can't. Almost every family wealth related feature is tied to certain
conditions, and/or has a limited number of times you can use it."
In essence, you are putting the cart before the horse. Before proposing some change to
the system, put together a convincing argument that a change is needed. Then, once the
problem has been identified, it can be analyzed, and a possible solution worked out.
--
Rob
Nothing...is unchangeable but the
inherent and inalienable rights of man.
-- Thomas Jefferson to J. Cartwright, 1824
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list