News

[Discuss] (no subject)

Frédérick Deslauriers freddelo at hotmail.com
Fri May 12 16:29:19 CEST 2006


Tom wrote:
>>1) The newbie that can't go outside the realm for the first week, that's a 
>>restrictive change to prevent that newbs from causing trouble. In my 
>>opinion if newb going attack your neighbours and cause trouble, it's 
>>because your ruler is a bad diplomat and doesn't deserve to occupy his 
>>position.
>It's also to prevent newbies from destroying their entire unit on the first 
>day, due to ignorance or beginners' mistakes.

So what... you learn from your mistakes, like in life newb make mistake and 
it's okay. My mom never made me wear and helmet and padding when I first 
learn to walk.

>>2) the 1 message per turn while in prison to the judge or ruler, it was 
>>implemented after a ruler (or judge) complained about a player that 
>>spammed him. In my opinion if you're too stupid to hit the ignore button 
>>you don't deserve to hold such a position.
>You couldn't ignore those messages, and ignore only works _after_ the fact, 
>so if someone sent you 1000 messages before you hit the button then those 
>1000 messages are still there.

How many time did a judge or ruler did really get spammed? and unstead of 
punishing the spammer and warning the potential one (i.e. when in prison you 
had a clear message stating that spamming would make you been remove from 
the game), you implemented a restrictive solution that affect every one, 
includind the good player that were have intelligent relation while in 
prison.


>>I suggest that after a month or 2 after the change has been implemented, 
>>you add a quick link to a survey about that change, in the login page.
>Honestly, opinions matter little. People who hate something often hate it 
>because they don't see the context of it. More than once, someone who came 
>to the list expressing his deep dislike of a feature or change reconsidered 
>after it was explained to him.

Let's see: From now on, no one shall be outside after dark. Now let me 
explain you the context,

-The baker complained that he had been robbed.
-Robbers work in the dark,
-So a good solution is that everyone have to be at home before the sun goes 
down.

Since that I have explain you the context, you surely understand why. But 
still to make a single person happy, we restrict the liberty of all other.

Also It's hard to believe that opinions doesn't matter to you, as on many 
occasion I have seen change in the game after, someone had whine on the 
D-List. Either you only made these changes because you were tired to hear 
from them, or because opinions does matter.

-----------------------------

Overall Tom, I was really looking to hear from you (I don't know why but 
usually your opinion matters to me), and I hardly can explain my deception. 
It seems that you had only gave attention to the examples I had gave and 
that wasn't the point of my message.

I want to point out that many changes have been made for a loud minority and 
cut the fun for the silent majority. That some bad player (could even be me 
sometime) cause situation that are corrected with a solution that penalizing 
everyone.




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss


More information about the Discuss-moderated mailing list