[Discuss] City State Realms

[Justin Pope]

> Also, I didnt think that there was any rule against seeking a
> strategic advantage.

Using certain things like secessions, changing capitals, handing away
regions, for a strategic advantage when there is no IC reason has
gotten people into hot water before.

> Plus, while all those city states might have federations, they might
> not all decide to go to war.

Right. Years ago, Hasland was huge and split into three parts to avoid
the code penalties. We'd been roleplaying duchies since before duchies
were in code, so it was just an extension of the separation we'd
already been doing. Norland flipped allegiences, and together with a
civil war, defeated Hasland, and went to war with Southasland a couple
times.

You can't gurantee who's going to be the next king of your colony, or
whether all the new players there are going to give a darn about their
history as a child realm to you.  (all the more fun...)
-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss