[Discuss] "Not Orders"

[Tom]

Jonathon Taylor schrieb:
> So just me letting them know that we are going to war so they dont 
> have to forfeit there honor to come join the war because I know how 
> long they've been waiting for it, is breakin an inalienable rule, them 
> I'm currently wearing a tu-tu and dancing on the keyboard as I type this.
That's certainly a funny view, can you post a photograph?



I'm going to explain this one more time and then put it on the Wiki as well:

I defend the inalienable rights with *extreme prejudice*. There's one 
simple reason for that: The second you open them up to interpretation, 
exceptions, borderline cases, etc. you write a huge invitation to the 
lawyer-weasels who get a thrill out of gaming the system.

Absolutely no violations of inalienable rights will be tolerated, no 
matter how minor or inconsequential. Absolutely no interpretations will 
turn a violation into a non-violation. Absolutely no "I didn't mean it" 
apologies will prevent the punishment - consider it a lesson for next 
time and a reassurance that you yourself will be equally aggressively 
defended should someone else attack your inalienable rights.
-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss