[Discuss] "Not Orders"

[Tom]

M. Covington schrieb:
> the members of the realm. Simply put some things need to be keep quiet
> until they are ready otherwise sneak attacks and such things simply
> can not happen in the game. If a ruler can't say "Hey there is
> something in the works that happens before the tourney is over so
> please take that into consideration before you move out." then you are
> hamstringing them.
And in a good way. If your plan fails because some of your troop leaders 
are at a tournament, then I'd blame the plan first, and the troop 
leaders second.


>  The inaleinable right regarding tourneys is in my
> humble opinion BS. I can see the case made for a democracy where it
> would be upheld but in a tyranny I dare say that the only inaleinable
> right should be to the ruler to take your head anytime he pleases.
If we were realistically simulating tyrannies, there would be none in 
this game, because they wouldn't be fun for anyone but the ruler.

Please take into account that with all things we strike a balance 
between simulation and playability.

That's why we have some inalienable rights to protect things that even 
in a medieval republic wouldn't have been protected - because what we do 
protect here isn't a nobles ability to go and meet his peers, but a 
players ability to enjoy the game.



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss