[Discuss] Code Changes (rebellions)

[Jamie Cheyfetz]

On 3/23/06, Vinnie <vinnietje at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2006/3/23, Tom <tom at lemuria.org>:
> > Thomas Dalton schrieb:
> > > I think getting land more involved in rebellions would be quite fun.
> > > Let battles between rebels and loyalists happen anywhere, not just the
> > > capital.
> > They do. It's just that normally, the rebel forces are already in the
> > capital when they start the rebellion.
> >
>
> I know they do, but they're pointless. Why can't you win a rebellion
> in a single region, and go claim that?
>
> A non-capital region? Or maybe a city? And maybe just winning the
> battle wouldn't be enough to claim "the region", maybe you'd also need
> some sort of takeover.
>
> And then the possibilities are endless. Rebels could recruit from
> regions they control, directly, ...

That's quite the idea.  Being able to rebel any region that can be a
capital.  Kind of like a secession, but through localized rebellion,
with the possibility of adding on regions (under some time constraint)
through rebellious takeover rather than normal...
-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss