[Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?

[Alex Davies]

>From: "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?
>Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:46:40 +0100
>
>Your message didn't actually make sense ("if then not refusing
>rulership" - I see now you means "if they're not"), so I guessed at
>what you meant - I got it wrong, sorry.  I think it's an excellent way
>to manipulate the elections.  Rulers shouldn't be selected by
>popularity, that's just the easiest way to handle it.  There being
>only one person eligible (eg. the former King's son) is far more
>realistic.

Sorry, my bad.

But my example was like in a democracy or republic (maybe a theo?) but I was 
thinking mainly of a demo. In which case a kings son example is not so 
effective. Also, in these cases,  it is popularity that decides, or is at 
least supposed to.

Moaning about the breakdown of a voting system in a tyranny is a bit stupid.

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each 
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss