[Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?

[Alex Davies]

>From: "Björn Falkenström" <falkenstrom at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?
>Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:28:35 +0200
>
>I see, I haven´t noticed. I suppose my ruler chars usually have no problem
>meeting the prestige requirement.
>
>Isn´t 15 a little steep considering that after 25, it is getting awfully
>hard to get prestige?


>
>
>--
>Unsubscribing and other list options:
>http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

I think the idea is if you don't have anyone over 15 then you have everyone 
who is 10 or above. In larger realms or more war-like realms it's not a 
problem. But small realms who aren't at war with anyone (like most [all?] of 
BT about a month and a half ago) find themselves at the mercy

But your point about it being hard to get more than 25 prestige doesn't make 
sense; you don't need that much. In fact, beyond 25 all you would need it 
for would be things like voting in a monarchy. And getting prestige to 
overhaul a monarchy voting system 1. is nearly impossible and 2. smeels like 
powergaming. Who needs that much prestige?

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each 
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss