[Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?

[Alex Davies]

That's old. You've needed 15 prestige for a while now.

I've often wondered if you only have one person truly eligible if then not 
refusing rulership (say if you're in a demo or republic and you aret the 
only person people can vote for) should be considered as abusing the game 
mechnics that are there. Does anyone else think the borders should be more 
fluid?

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each 
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.





>From: "Björn Falkenström" <falkenstrom at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: discuss at news.battlemaster.org
>Subject: [Discuss] Prestige req for ruler changed?
>Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 00:19:06 +0200
>
>I wonder if the prestige requirement for ruler has changed. My char on the
>Far East has 11 prestige and it says the follow line about him when I check
>to see who is eligable.
>
>"not enough prestige, but he might be eligible (if nobody is fully
>eligible)."
>
>It used to be 10 prestige for ruler.


>
>
>--
>Unsubscribing and other list options:
>http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss