[Discuss] Kinda weird question.

[AJ]

Alex Davies wrote:
>> If you realm's military relies on "activity" to be successful, then 
>> your realm's military sucks.
> It doesn't rely on activity, as such, it relies on what meager forces 
> we actually have being able to hold. We train brilliantly but only 
> have 1.5K CS in reliable mobile, 3.5K on a good day, and just under 5K 
> if everyone moves (which they won't), while the oppsing realm boasts 
> single TL units of 600-800 CS each (and their prime minister has 1.4K 
> CS in his single unit).
>
> It never gets easy. 

In a small vs larger war, you either need good diplomacy to get you good 
allies or you need good diplomacy to get you out of the war!
In no way is activity related to whether you can or cannot win wars. 
Inactivity is _not_ enforced by code and directed at your realm! It 
affects _everyone_ period.
You are affected? Trust me, your enemy will be crying the same rant!

The bottle spins both ways

aJ

-- 
bLogging @ http://ramblings.ajaxed.net



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss