[Discuss] Claims on rogue regions

[Robert Croson, Jr]

On 20 Jul 2006 at 12:08, Dorian Gray wrote:

> If a region of realm A is TO'ed by realm B, goes rogue, and TO'ed by realm B again, should realm 
> A's claim remain? 
> 
> In regions directly TO'ed from a realm there's the claim, and I've not appointed a region lord (on 
> stable - I don't know if all the features of claims are on stable yet, but I didn't try anyway since 
> that's how claims were meant to work). Region we nt rogue and we TO'ed it again, and the 
> option is there to appoint a lord, but the region is still under claim - I don't know whether it's 
> because claims haven't been fully enabled on stable or because the region is rogue. Although, 
> talking to others, t he same thing happened in another region and when the region was rogue 
> and then TO'ed again the claim was removed, yet in this case the claim is still there even when 
> the region is rogue. 

I've seen it happen both ways. i.e. I have seen claims removed when a region 
goes rogue, and I have seen claims remain when a region goes rogue.

There is probably some additional information that gets factored into the 
equation to determine if the claim is removed or not when a region goes rogue. 
It most likely takes things several things into account, such as realm control, 
sympathy, loyalty, and probably even how long the region has been held.


-- 
Rob

A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from
injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to
regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall
not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is
the sum of good government, and all that is necessary to close the
circle of our felicities.
-- Thomas Jefferson, in his 1801 inaugural address




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss