[Discuss] Banning for no reason

[Christopher Clarke]

Hello everyone,

I just read the rules for banning, because my banker has gone inactive
and I have no other way to replace him quickly. I've decided that it's
not allowed for me to ban him for this reason.

But, upon reviewing the rules, I feel that my recent banning was a
clear and definite violation, even though the Titans disagreed.

My character, Doyle, was banned from Lasanar even though he did
absolutely nothing wrong. The only reason I was given was that I was a
traitor. When I asked for evidence, the judge and ruler both refused.

> No arbitrary or reasonless kicking
Seems that there is no reason. It's certainly arbitrary.

> Punish Actions
> You should kick for what people did, not for what
> they are or what they failed to do.
I did nothing, and offered very convincing evidence to attempt to
prove it, even though you cannot prove the non-existence of anything.

> Benefit of the doubt
Heh.

Now, I understand that in the middle ages anyone could be banned for
any reason. I also understand that there are some rules in place in
the game that aren't necessarily historic, in order to keep the game
fun for everyone. The only reason I can see for doing this is that
some players are trying to put their OOC friends' characters in power.

I'm curious as to what others think.

Cheers,
Chris


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss