[Discuss] Inaleignable rights; rule 2.

[Timothy Collett]

On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Jonas De Greef wrote:
> Yes, you can give the order, but as I've told, you don't have to  
> obey it. It doesn't matter weither the general gives the order, or  
> the duke, or the ruler, or the banker, or just about anyone. As  
> long as it can't be ENFORCED by law and punishment, it isn't an  
> obligation. What can the ruler do? Look nasty? If you can't enforce  
> an order by punishment, there is no reason whatsoever for you to  
> obey it, the order being from the general, or anyone else.

There's a reason the inalienable rights are specifically forbidden  
from even being requested or suggested by those in power.

Even if the Judge can't fine or ban you for not following the order  
to recruit a certain unit type, the General can pass you over for  
leadership roles.  The Ruler can pass you over for region command  
positions.  Your standing in the realm in general can decrease.

That's why the inalienable rights prohibitions are specifically  
worded not to just refer to giving orders, and that's why the change  
doesn't make this inalienable right redundant.

Timothy Collett
Anaris Family

--

No battle is ever won according to plan, but no battle was ever won  
without a plan, either.



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss