[Discuss] Inaleignable rights; rule 2.
Jonas De Greef
curs21 at hotmail.com
Fri Dec 1 21:18:09 CET 2006
"There was never an OOC rule that you had to follow the general's
orders. Nothing has changed." ~~Thomas Dalton
That's the point, something HAS changed. There may not have been an OOC
rule, but you could be punished for not following orders. And that happened
many times. That's exactly the same as a rule, as you oblige people to
follow orders, otherwise they would be punished.
Now, as punishment is forbidden, you don't have to follow the orders
anymore. You are free from punishment and you may obey what you like. For
this very reason, something HAS changed.
In this context, as I said before, it would be logical that if everyone may
obey whatever they like (without being punished), that the generals may
order what they like, including the unit type.
_________________________________________________________________
Inge heeft ontdekt hoe ze in groep kan werken zonder ruzie te krijgen!
http://get.live.com/messenger/features#EOH
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list