[Discuss] Change to positions

[LilWolf]

Marc J. wrote:
>
> So, everyone goes to the 'Orders' page, and very similarly to a 
> rebellion, declare which "side" they support.
>
> Could also spin off to other features - like Dukes X and Y deciding to 
> ally to destroy the General's forces, (after all, he's got the army, 
> so they'll need to join together to beat him) so there could be a 
> "fight alongside/be wary/destroy on sight" stance on the other 
> claimants troops. (Would corroborate to: Alliance/Neutral/Hatred for 
> the battle code)
>
>

I don't really like the idea that getting a new ruler would lead to 
actual battles within the realm. That puts the amount of destruction 
caused by it too high in my opinion. It's already pretty bad that you're 
in a situation where people are actively wanting to change the ruler. 
Why discourage it by creating a penalty (internal realm fights would be 
a pretty hefty penalty in times of war. Maybe even worse than a 
"missing" ruler)?


-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss