[Discuss] Change to positions

[Alex Davies]

>From: "Dorian Gray" <portrait.of.dorian.gray at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list 
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Change to positions
>Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:20:34 +1000
>
>On 8/18/06, Alex Davies <the1exile at hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>I don't like the temporary rulers who step down when the old one is back,
>>but nor do I like now essentially having permanent rulers.
>
>
>Indeed - now in Theocracies, Tyrannies and Monarchies, the only way to get
>ruler turnover is by:
>-Ruler stepping down (big h/p loss, unlikely to happen frequently)
>-Autopausing/deleting (OOC, unlikely but it happens)
>-Die in battle (only works if rulers are mortal (not happening) or heroes)
>-Emigrate (unlikely)
>-Protests (I don't see rulers protested out much)
>-Rebellion (AFAIK still broken)
>
>It seems we can't find a happy medium - if we lock people into positions, 
>we
>have no turnover. If we let people choose, we have 'interim leaders'.

Exactly.

Was there a problem with the H & P losses that were imlemented to stop this 
problem in thefirst place?

The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)

The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each 
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb



-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss