[Discuss] Temporary position holders
Alex Davies
the1exile at hotmail.co.uk
Wed Aug 2 00:24:21 CEST 2006
>From: "Gloria Santos" <gloria.santos at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: BattleMaster general discussion list
><discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>To: "BattleMaster general discussion list" <discuss at news.battlemaster.org>
>Subject: Re: [Discuss] Temporary position holders
>Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:34:14 -0500
>
>On 8/1/06, Björn Falkenström <falkenstrom at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"I agree!
>>
>>How people like to play should come before anything "the rules" say they
>>should play. As Tom refuses to have written rules for this game, it is
>>the
>>players who determine how it shall be played. DA was re-elected King
>>because that's what the players and their characters want."
>>
>>That is interesting considering that when I brought up on the discussion
>>list that I liked to play characters in enemy realms but couldn´t hold
>>council positions in both (which make that I need to choose, which you
>>can´t
>>do as a roleplayers as all characters are equally important), you, Gloria,
>>specificly told me that you didn´t want me, Björn, to play more positions
>>and let others have a shot at it, and that is why that restriction was
>>good.
>>Reading what you just wrote, you could think you have turned around
>>completely ;)
>>
>
>I still think holding two council positions in one same continent would be
>a
>bit selfish because you wouldn't give a chance to other people.
I agree in principle, but in practice it gets difficult, especially if you
have two characters on the same continent who are *both* brilliant at their
job, especially if the position in question is general. If two realms on the
same continent want the same player to be their general, how are you
supposed to choose? Especially on FEI, many players choose to have two of
their characters there. In my own case it prevents me from throwing a
rebellion with one character at precisely the same time as my other is
offered general.
Yes, I know there is an easy solution to this, play on a different
continent. But I actually prefer one continent to another, and i don't like
the fact that my gameplay is hindered because of it.
>But "eternal legitimate constantly reelected rulers" are a whole different
>issue. And I happen to like them.
I think this will not be a problem if functions such as assassination work
properly.
The1exile (AKA Sniperchief)
The Internet is truly a wealth of exotic and meaningful information. Each
new nugget of knowledge it brings to me makes me a little bit stupider.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list