[Discuss] Region Claims

[Robert Croson, Jr]

On 1 Aug 2006 at 13:01, Alex Davies wrote:

> >>>Are region claims not yet working or how do they even work?  I am the 
> >>>Prime Minister of The Cagilan Empire, I cannot appoint a lord to Nida, 
> >>>which Carelia has a claim to, however, Carelia was able to appoint a lord 
> >>>to Skalk, which CE has a claim to.  Is this a bug?  I believe Kronos 
> >>>bought the title the first time, correct me if I'm wrong Kronos (or 
> >>>someone in Carelia), does that make a difference?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>I believe buying the region removes the claim and acts like a sort of 
> >>instant TO as it would have been before claims were implemented. In other 
> >>words, that region now belongs to Carelia, not CE.
> >>
> >
> >No, it's still listed as claimed by CE if you look at the region page.
> >
> 
> 
> Odd. The  I wish someone would explain Region claims, theres a lot of 
> unanswered questions on 
> http://wiki.battlemaster.org/index.php/Talk:Region_Claim .

>From what I understand, buying a title is not the same as appointing a lord. 
You can't appoint a lord because the people do not acknowledge your right to 
rule them. However, when you buy the title, you are, in essence, merely 
exerting your (suposed) hereditary right to that title. You do this by bribing 
people and forging documents. It really has nothing to do with who currently 
claims the region.

* You are *supposed* to be able to buy the title to a region with a claim on it.

* You are *not* supposed to be able to appoint a local lord in a region with a  
claim on it. (However, this doesn't always work, and you can, in some cases, 
still do it.)

This info is culled from various discussions and posts from many people, 
including Tom. 

-- 
Rob

Worrying about something is like paying interest
on a debt you don't even know if you owe.
-- Mark Twain




-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss