[Discuss] Royals banishment (partially being discussed in "Infiltrator against own realm ")

[Aaron Champion]

On 12/12/05, Jonathon Taylor <jonathon.its.never.enough at googlemail.com> wrote:
>  But as far as I can tell, you're Royal through out. Never not. Although it
> would make sense if a rebellion happened, I can see why they would lose
> there status then but I think it would be difficult to determine wether the
> Royal is part of the rebellion or not and the complications behind in what
> scenarios and when would they lose there status.

The only reason I can think of that there would be confusion on this
issue relates to the heirarchy code, and FEI in particular.  Since a
lot of Dukes were manually installed (and later founded their own
realms), it created some interesting scenarios where Kings were listed
as Nobles or Lords, and not Royals.  I've lost Royal status by
stepping down.  I don't know if that was intended, but it happened. 
As it stands, the same character is ruler again, and is now Royal.

Should an unscrupulous player have taken that opportunity to convince
the judge to ban me (and it was possible, I checked), that would have
worried me far more than probing every possible scenario by which a
Royal might be banned.
-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss