[Discuss] In-game poll
Tom
tom at lemuria.org
Tue Dec 6 23:33:49 CET 2005
Message from Morgan Evans, received on 04. Dec 2005 at 06:26:
> Actually, to be honest, while the BM system of voting is slightly better
> than 'normal' voting, it isn't better by much. The best voting system that
> I know of is the system used by the city of Cambridge, Massachusetts
> (USA), and also by the Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts. I'm not sure
> of the exact name of it, but it involves numbering your choices in order
> that you wish to vote for. If your first choice does not have enough
> votes, then your full vote goes to your next choice, and so on.
BM uses a variant of the Borda count system.
The wikipedia page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_systems
tells you advantages and disadvantages of voting systems.
The points where Borda count falls short are all acceptable within the
context of BM, IMHO:
Majority - ok because it fails because a small majority will not win
if strongly disliked by everyone else. For BM, that is a good feature
because you can't become ruler with 51% of the realm strongly behind
you and 49% of the realm hating you.
Condorcet - just barely, but acceptable especially seen that all voting
systems that succeed here fail in more criticial points.
IA - I'm not entirely sure about this but I _believe_ that I have
largely eliminated the existend of irrelevant alternatives by limiting
the ballot to three slots. I can't mathematically prove it, though.
Clone - I actually consider this a feature, not a bug. It makes
internal politics more interesting.
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom at lemuria.org>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5
--
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss-moderated
mailing list