[Discuss] Rebellions.

[AJ]

TheKobald at aol.com wrote:

> Drachanwald had, had a rebellion going on.  Last turn it said that 
> loyalist forces were getting the situation under control.  This turn 
> CE, Darka and Tara all attacked the capital and defeated the loyalists 
> and the rebellious forces (because they of course both defended the 
> capital against those that were sieging it), and the rebellion 
> succeed, even though the leader of the rebellion was wounded.  This 
> does not make sense to me, if both of them were defeated in battle the 
> rebellion shouldn't have succeeded since they're still on even 
> ground.  I could understand if the rebellious forces fought with the 
> CE, Tara and Darkan army and then gained control of the capital.  Is 
> this the way the coding is intended?

Actually it is another form of a 3 way battle and there is no successful 
way to resolve them. And I think the code first checks if the rebellion 
forces are stronger than the loyalist forces(which had to be in this 
case how much ever small the difference maybe) and hence declares the 
winner. The rebellion is based on the strength of opposing forces and 
not on which leader(loyalist or rebellious) leader is fit/wounded.

aJ
__________________________
bLogging at http://aj.accosted.net/rambler
Shin: a device for finding furniture in the dark.
-- 
Unsubscribing and other list options:
http://news.battlemaster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss